Close

Philip Payes v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case Regarding Mental-Mental Cases and Abnormal Working Conditions

In Payes v. WCAB, decided October 30,2013, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that the Commonwealth Court erred by not accepting the well-supported facts by the Workers’ Compensation Judge establishing the existence of an extraordinarily unusual and distressing single work-related event experienced by Appellant (injured worker) resulting in his disabling mental condition, where such single and comprehensive work-related event constituted an abnormal working condition as a matter of law.

In cases like these, which we call “mental-mental”, where a mental stimulus causes a mental injury, an injured worker must prove abnormal working conditions under PA Work Comp Law.

The Mental-Mental Case – Payes v. WCAB

The factual predicate of this case is rather simple, but not common. The Claimant was a trooper with the Pennsylvania State Police and worked as such for about 12 years before the incident which happened on November 29, 2006. On that date, he was driving his patrol car at 545am, while it was dark, when a woman dressed in all black, including a black cap, suddenly ran in front of and was struck by his car. She flipped over the vehicle and landed on the highway. He immediately got out of his car to attend to her, as she was bleeding from the mouth. As he was trying to revive her, he also had to try to divert oncoming traffic from hitting himself and the victim. The incident was caught on film by a camera mounted on his patrol car. Other troopers arrived, but she was pronounced dead at the scene.

Later, it was discovered that she suffered from mental illness. The trooper was transported to a hospital for testing as he was exposed to her blood. He returned to work in early January, 2007 but after four days, his feelings of anxiousness and stress led him to believe he could not continue to perform his job as a state trooper.

The Burden of Proof In A Mental Injury Under The PA Work Comp Act

Claimant filed a Claim Petition alleging Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. After hearings and presentation of testimony, including expert psychiatric testimony, the Workers’ Compensation Judge found him credible and his medical expert. The WCJ found Claimant had met his burden of proving a mental injury arising from a work-related mental stimulus and while state troopers may expect to encounter or be involved with violent situations, that this particular work-related stimulus was not one normally encountered by or expect of state troopers- and therefore, that Claimant met his burden of showing abnormal working conditions- which is required for mental-mental cases.

Mental Injury
Image Source: pexels/SHVETS production

The Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board reversed the WCJ’s ruling finding that this incident did not constitute abnormal working conditions given the nature of Claimant’s “stressful and perilous profession”.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Verdict on Mental-Mental Case

The Commonwealth Court affirmed the WCAB’s Decision holding as a matter of law that Claimant’s injury did not result from an abnormal working condition, citing in part the notion that in the line of a police officer, Claimant can be expected to be witness to horrible tragedy. The Commonwealth Court broke down each part of the accident and post-accident events, claiming each sequence was not extraordinary for that type of work.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in a 22-page Decision, held that the Commonwealth Court erred by not accepting the well-supported facts found by the WCJ which established the existence of an extraordinarily unusual and depressing single work-related event experienced by Claimant resulting in his disabling mental condition. The Court first reviewed the standard on appeal- that is, that the Court must affirm the adjudication below unless it finds that an error of law was committed, that constitutional rights were violated, that a practice or procedure of a Commonwealth agency was not followed or that any necessary finding of fact is not supported by substantial evidence of record. It then discussed the abnormal working condition precedent, emphasizing just how “highly fact sensitive” the exercise is. In classifying what is “abnormal”, the Court recognized that there is no bright line test or a generalized standard. Instead, we must consider the specific work environment of the claimant. The Court then analyzed specific cases involving abnormal working conditions and police officers.

What is abnormal working conditions

The ‘Normal’ Working Conditions For A Police Officer

Most importantly, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court seized on one of the WCJ’s Findings- specifically number 13 wherein the WCJ concluded that State Troopers are not in their normal course of their duties when exposed to what occurred in this case- a mentally disturbed person running in front of Claimant’s vehicle for no apparent reason. Likewise, what the Claimant had to deal with in the aftermath was not something that normally occurs for State Troopers. This Finding, said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, was not found to be unsupported by the evidence, nor was it arbitrary and capricious such that it could be set aside. The Commonwealth Court, reformulated Finding 13 of the WCJ, into unrelated component parts, where each part standing alone, might be safely determined to be a “normal” working condition for a police officer.

Finding The Right Brain Injury Lawyer To Represent Your Work Comp Case in PA

But because the injury arose from a single incident, the inquiry must rest on whether that single incident alone, and not any purportedly comparable sets of incidents, was abnormal. Finding 13 by the WCJ, which was not disturbed on appeal, found that the incident was not one to which state troopers are normally exposed. The Court found that the record supported this Finding.

Payes v. WCAB Under The PA Workers’ Compensation Act

This is a great decision for injured workers in Pennsylvania. It shows that you cannot assume that because a person is in a rough and tumble type of job, that the person is never going to experience anything unusual. Even a State Trooper can be confronted with highly unusual or “abnormal” working conditions which results in significant psychological injury. The Decision also reminds us to really examine the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s Findings, because if they are supported by the record, and not disturbed on appeal, they govern.

Call Cardamone Law Today

For more information about Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Practice or Procedure, call or email Certified Pennsylvania Work Injury Attorney Michael W. Cardamone at 215-206-9068 or michael@cardamonelaw.com for a free and prompt consult 7 days a week.

Awards & Recognitions

Pennsylvania Workmans Comp Attorney
Philadelphia Workmans Comp Lawyer

Cardamone Law Has Negotiated Some of the Largest Workers’ Comp Settlements in Pennsylvania

$2.2 Million
Spinal Injury
$897,000
Lower Back Injury
$650,000
Lower Back Injury
$550,000
Neck Injury
$425,000
Leg Injury
$375,000
Knee Injury
$325,000
Ankle Injury
& Hundreds More Cases
$2.2 Million
Spinal Injury
$897,000
Lower Back Injury
$650,000
Lower Back Injury
$550,000
Neck Injury
$425,000
Leg Injury
$375,000
Knee Injury
$325,000
Ankle Injury
& Hundreds More Cases

Client Testimonials

"Best Law Firm around!"

"Cardomone law is absolutely fantastic! They are very responsive and helpful and they will fight to get you what you deserve. Shirley is also very helpful whenever you have any questions! Best Law Firm around!"

- C. Edwards
Google Reviews
"Michael and Shirley are very dedicated...and getting the maximum amount favorable to my case"

"Cardamone Law Firm were very helpful to me since day one. Michael and Shirley are very dedicated to my case giving me updates, answering my questions, being honest with my case, and getting the maximum amount favorable to my case. Thank you so much for your service and dedication and helping me to achieve not only your case but to guide and refer me in other needs too! You guys are the best law firm friendly and dedicated. I will recommend to anyone."

- A. Ortiz
Google Reviews
"Michael won my workers comp case after my employer insurance denied my claim."

"Exceptional firm. Highly recommend this law firm. Michael won my Workers Comp case after my employer insurance denied my claim. Him and his staff were always at my reach for legal and emotional support. Am so happy I hire them. Thanks Michael and Ms. Shirley."

- Carlos P.
Google Reviews
"[They] did an excellent job in getting me financially compensated in a fairly short amount of time."

"I recently had a work related injury and was receiving Workers' Compensation (medical benefits only). Soon after I was fired, so I contacted Paul Silver at Cardamone Law Firm who did an excellent job in getting me financially compensated in a fairly short amount of time. Paul and his assistant Shirley always responded to any questions I had about the case in a very short amount of time. Thank you for helping me with this difficult case."

- Robin C.
Google Reviews
"Highly recommend."

"Cardamone Law was great with helping my husband with his Workers Comp issues. Mike and Shirley were the best with letting us know what was going on every step of the way. Highly recommend."

- Danielle P.
Google Reviews
"Mike Cardamone is amazing"

"Mike Cardamone is amazing. He is "hands down" one of the best lawyers I've ever had the privilege of knowing. He is very kind, understanding, knowledgeable in his field, always very thorough and helpful. He was extremely professional and someone who truly cares about his clients. I felt completely at ease with him. He was a pleasure to work with, explained everything in detail, as well as answered all my questions with knowledge and care. If you want someone you can trust, who communicates every step of the way, will fight for you and make sure you win your case, he is it! I will refer all my family and friends to him. Thank you so much Mike, for everything. I appreciate all your hard work and dedication in helping me."

- Allie M.
Google Reviews
Without a doubt YOU are the best!!!

"Without a doubt YOU are the best!!! Every person who is in the horrible position of being injured at work should have someone as kind, compassionate and knowledgeable as you on their side. You never once made me feel like I was one of a hundred other clients. I always knew you had my back! You answered calls and emails at all hours. You fought every fight for me so I only had to worry about getting well. Behind your nice, calm face there’s a pit bull ready to take on any employer or judge. I can never thank you enough."

- L. Edall
Google Reviews
"Best Workers' Comp Lawyer!"

"Michael is simply the best! He was there for me from day 1 till the end, and we won the case!! He is always available to help. I had a gazillion questions and he would answer them one by one. He's a great lawyer and I feel lucky to have found him online from reading other outstanding reviews about him. Believe me, they're true!"

- Faith B.
Google Reviews
"Great Attorney"

"Great attorney, handled case quickly and efficiently. I would recommend him and would use him again. He was always available to answer any questions we had. Thank you, Mr. Cardamone."

- H. Anderson
Google Reviews