The Official Partner of the American WorkerSM
All calls are confidential and there are no fees until we win.
Free Case Review Call Us (267) 651-7945
Close
No Recovery No Fee Guaranteed
The Official Partner of the American WorkerSM

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Changes Workers’ Compensation Law Regarding Claimants’ Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees Under Section 440 Of The Act- Lorino Case

On December 22, 2021, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in Lorino vs. WCAB, reversed the Commonwealth Court and held that in cases where claimant is victorious, a Work Comp Judge may, at his or her discretion, award attorneys’ fees to be paid by the work comp carrier. Prior to this case, fees would be awarded only where a reasonable contest wasn’t provided by the employer/insurer. (a reasonable contest would be a case where there is conflicting medical evidence by the two medical experts- one says a claimant is fully recovered and the other says they aren’t)

Why does this matter? In cases where wage loss is being paid, it’s easy for an injured worker to obtain counsel as the attorney has a clear way to get paid with victory- 20% of the wage loss benefits in most cases. But when an injured worker has a “medical only” case whereby no wage loss is being paid, it’s much more difficult for the worker to get counsel as the attorney would have to charge an hourly rate and many injured workers are struggling and cannot afford that- or the attorney had to have hoped for an award of attorney’s fees which Work Comp Judges don’t often award. This case will make it easier for injured workers to get counsel and level the playing field. However, the ruling isn’t just applicable to “medical only” cases. In this case- Lorino– it was a medical only claim.

The Court began its analysis, noting that due to the matter involving statutory interpretation, the standard of review was de novo, and the scope of review was plenary. Of course, the Court looked at the plain language of the relevant part of the Act at issue:

Section 440(a) provides:

In any contested case where the insurer has contested liability in whole or in part, including contested cases involving petitions to terminate . . ., the employee . . . in whose favor the matter at issue has been finally determined in whole or in part shall be awarded, in addition to the award for compensation, a reasonable sum for costs incurred for attorney’s fee, witnesses, necessary medical examination, and the value of unreimbursed lost time to attend the proceedings: Provided, That cost for attorney fees may be excluded when a reasonable basis for the contest has been established by the employer or the insurer. (emphasis added)

The Court went on to reason:

“The term “shall” establishes a mandatory duty, whereas the term “may” connotates an act that is permissive, but not mandated or required. Indeed, in Ramich, we specifically addressed the term “shall” in the context of Section 440(a) when we considered whether a claimant must request attorney’s fees on the record in order to receive such an award. In holding there was no such requirement, we observed: “[t]he language of Section 440(a) is plain and unambiguous. The legislature used ‘shall’ to describe the duty of the WCJ in awarding fees for an unreasonable contest and it is clear that this provision is a mandatory directive.” 770 A.2d at 322.

As the WCJ determined that the employer’s contest was unreasonable in Ramich, we did not address the last sentence of Section 440(a) at issue herein.

Furthermore, we have explained that, when the legislature uses the terms “shall” and “may” in the same section of a statute, it is a clear indication that the legislature intends certain actions to be mandatory, and others discretionary. For example, our decision in Zimmerman is illustrative in that regard. Therein, despite the Attorney General’s determination that certain proposed agency regulations were without statutory authority, the agency published the regulations in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, rendering them immediately effective. The Attorney General sought to stay promulgation of the regulations pursuant to Section 204(b) of the Commonwealth Attorneys Act, 71 P.S. § 732-101 et seq. The Commonwealth Court denied the application for stay, and the Attorney General appealed.”

Based on the established meaning of the terms “shall” and “may,” under Section 440, when a contested case is resolved in favor of an employee, the Court found that a reasonable sum for attorney’s fees shall be awarded to the claimant. And, that such an award is mandatory. However, where the employer has established a reasonable basis for the contest, an award of attorney’s fees may be excluded. In other words, the WCJ is permitted, but not required, to exclude an award of attorney’s fees.

This is a groundbreaking and outstanding case for injured workers. There is little doubt, however, that this issue will be litigated for years to come, as the Court did not give guidance on the “discretion” given to Work Comp Judges, leaving room for litigants to argue for more parameters and guidance on the topic.

Here is a link to the Lorino vs WCAB Opinion

If you have any questions about this case, call us (215) 206-9068

Pennsylvania Workers’ Comp Attorneys

Awards & Recognitions

Philadelphia workers comp lawyer
Philadelphia workmans comp lawyer
Bucks County workers comp lawyer
best workmans comp lawyer philadelphia
Philadelphia Workmans Comp Lawyer
Top 10 Attorneys Award Pennsylvania workers' comp lawyer
Philadelphia workmans comp lawyer
Philadelphia workers compensation lawyer
best bucks county workmans comp lawyer
Avvo Rating 10.0 Philadelphia workers' comp lawyer
Workmans comp lawyer
best workmans comp attorney
best Philly workmans comp lawyer
Bucks county workmans comp lawyer
best Philadelphia workmans comp lawyer

Cardamone Law Has Negotiated Some of the Largest Workers’ Comp Settlements in Pennsylvania

$6 Million
We Assisted Another Firm in Reaching Settlement
$2.2 Million
Spinal Injury
$897,000
Lower Back Injury
$650,000
Lower Back Injury
$550,000
Neck Injury
$425,000
Leg Injury
$375,000
Knee Injury
$325,000
Ankle Injury
$6 Million
We Assisted Another Firm in Reaching Settlement
$2.2 Million
Spinal Injury
$897,000
Lower Back Injury
$650,000
Lower Back Injury
$550,000
Neck Injury
$425,000
Leg Injury
$375,000
Knee Injury
$325,000
Ankle Injury

Client Testimonials

"Thank you from the bottom of my heart Mike and Shirley!!"

I called Shirley when I was scared and didn’t know what where my next dime was coming from after I was out with my work injury. Shirley was very kind and helpful guiding me every single step of the way. Mike was not your typical lawyer was not pushy but very responsive to all my gazillion questions. He helped me get my settlement quickly and settlement check in a very timely manner. Would recommend them to anyone! Mike helped calm all my fears and anxieties as I was trying to navigate one of the hardest and most stressful times in my life. Thank you from the bottom of my heart Mike and Shirley!!

- Jen Thompson
Google Reviews
"Tienes un equipo impresionante a pesar de ser una compañía pequeña, los resultados fueron excelentes!"

Yo le daría 10 estrellas en vez de 5 , Michael Cardamone es una persona genuina y un gran abogado, al principio de mi caso, yo estaba en la oscuridad y no sabia que pasos tendría que seguir porque Workers comp ,solo me cubría en esos momentos los beneficios medicos .Después, me eliminaron el puesto , no sabia como manejar mi situación (estaba con una cirugía y también sin trabajo,) grasias a Mike, el me dirigió por el camino correcto, me dieron una muy buena cantidad por mi caso. El fue muy comprensivo porque le hice muchas preguntas por email y siempre me las contesto a tiempo, brindando seguridad ,sabia que estaba en las manos correctas! Shirley y Francisco también fueron de gran ayuda con los recordatorios y servicios de traducción en Español. tienes un equipo impresionante a pesar de ser una compañía pequeña, los resultados fueron excelentes! se los recomiendo a todos. Muchas grasias Cardamone law!

- Marisol Rodriguez
Google Reviews
"Best Law Firm around!"

"Cardomone law is absolutely fantastic! They are very responsive and helpful and they will fight to get you what you deserve. Shirley is also very helpful whenever you have any questions! Best Law Firm around!"

- C. Edwards
Google Reviews
"Michael and Shirley are very dedicated...and getting the maximum amount favorable to my case"

"Cardamone Law Firm were very helpful to me since day one. Michael and Shirley are very dedicated to my case giving me updates, answering my questions, being honest with my case, and getting the maximum amount favorable to my case. Thank you so much for your service and dedication and helping me to achieve not only your case but to guide and refer me in other needs too! You guys are the best law firm friendly and dedicated. I will recommend to anyone."

- A. Ortiz
Google Reviews
"Michael won my workers comp case after my employer insurance denied my claim."

"Exceptional firm. Highly recommend this law firm. Michael won my Workers Comp case after my employer insurance denied my claim. Him and his staff were always at my reach for legal and emotional support. Am so happy I hire them. Thanks Michael and Ms. Shirley."

- Carlos P.
Google Reviews
"[They] did an excellent job in getting me financially compensated in a fairly short amount of time."

"I recently had a work related injury and was receiving Workers' Compensation (medical benefits only). Soon after I was fired, so I contacted Paul Silver at Cardamone Law Firm who did an excellent job in getting me financially compensated in a fairly short amount of time. Paul and his assistant Shirley always responded to any questions I had about the case in a very short amount of time. Thank you for helping me with this difficult case."

- Robin C.
Google Reviews
"Highly recommend."

"Cardamone Law was great with helping my husband with his Workers Comp issues. Mike and Shirley were the best with letting us know what was going on every step of the way. Highly recommend."

- Danielle P.
Google Reviews
"Mike Cardamone is amazing"

"Mike Cardamone is amazing. He is "hands down" one of the best lawyers I've ever had the privilege of knowing. He is very kind, understanding, knowledgeable in his field, always very thorough and helpful. He was extremely professional and someone who truly cares about his clients. I felt completely at ease with him. He was a pleasure to work with, explained everything in detail, as well as answered all my questions with knowledge and care. If you want someone you can trust, who communicates every step of the way, will fight for you and make sure you win your case, he is it! I will refer all my family and friends to him. Thank you so much Mike, for everything. I appreciate all your hard work and dedication in helping me."

- Allie M.
Google Reviews
Without a doubt YOU are the best!!!

"Without a doubt YOU are the best!!! Every person who is in the horrible position of being injured at work should have someone as kind, compassionate and knowledgeable as you on their side. You never once made me feel like I was one of a hundred other clients. I always knew you had my back! You answered calls and emails at all hours. You fought every fight for me so I only had to worry about getting well. Behind your nice, calm face there’s a pit bull ready to take on any employer or judge. I can never thank you enough."

- L. Edall
Google Reviews
"Best Workers' Comp Lawyer!"

"Michael is simply the best! He was there for me from day 1 till the end, and we won the case!! He is always available to help. I had a gazillion questions and he would answer them one by one. He's a great lawyer and I feel lucky to have found him online from reading other outstanding reviews about him. Believe me, they're true!"

- Faith B.
Google Reviews
"Great Attorney"

"Great attorney, handled case quickly and efficiently. I would recommend him and would use him again. He was always available to answer any questions we had. Thank you, Mr. Cardamone."

- H. Anderson
Google Reviews