Close
No Recovery No Fee Guaranteed
The Official Partner of the American WorkerSM

Does An Employer In Pennsylvania Have To Show Job Availability For A Suspension of Workers’ Compensation Benefits When A Claimant Has Non-Work-Related Injuries That Are Totally Disabling?

No. Pursuant to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Decision in Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Cunningham), No. 2045 C.D. 2011. Claimant suffered a work-related injury to his right knee as a mechanic in June 1996- the Employer, after temporarily accepting his claim, then denied it. Claimant filed a Claim Petition. He returned to his pre-injury job shortly after the work accident. But in July 1996, Claimant was involved in a non-work-related car accident, injuring his left knee, low back, and left hand. He went out of work as a result. He had surgery for the work-related knee injury (right) in 1997 and returned to his pre-injury light duty position in April 1997. In December 1998, in a second non-work-related accident, Claimant was struck by a vehicle and hurt his left knee, low back, left hand, and left shoulder. He then stopped working and received sickness and accident benefits. He unsuccessfully tried returning to work in late December 1998 and has been out of work since.

The Workers’ Compensation Judge granted the Claim Petition and awarded total disability benefits for the periods in which Claimant was disabled from the June 1996 work injury and ongoing (to the extent he wasn’t already compensated). In August 2006, Employer filed a Petition to Modify and/or Suspend alleging that as of April 12, 2006, Claimant failed to respond in good faith to job offers referred to him within his physical and vocational abilities. During the litigation, Employer filed a second Petition to Modify/Suspend alleging Claimant was able to return to work as of November 9, 2005, but for his December 1998 non-work-related injuries. Employed deposed Dr. Joseph Bernstein, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon who opined that Claimant’s right knee had recovered sufficiently that Claimant was capable of performing sedentary work as of November 9, 2005 and that the only cause of Claimant’s continuing disability was the non-work-related December 1998 accident. Employer also presented the testimony of Michael Smychynsky, a vocational consultant, forensic economist, and certified rehabilitation counselor who interviewed Claimant and found jobs that he alleged were available to Claimant with wages of up to $400 per week. Claimant presented the testimony of Dr. Ronald Greene who concluded that Claimant was not capable of returning to work due to the condition of his right knee. The WCJ found that Dr. Bernstein’s testimony was more credible, granting Employer’s Modification Petition and reducing Claimant’s benefits for April 12, 2006 to January 26, 2007, and suspending his benefits as of January 26, 2007 as Claimant’s non-work-related injuries rendered him incapable of all possible work activity.

Claimant appealed and the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board affirmed the WCJ’s Decision to modify Claimant’s benefits, concluding that Claimant waived the argument. But the Board agreed with the Claimant that the WCJ erred in suspending Claimant’s benefits because Employer failed to establish the availability of a job equal to or greater than Claimant’s pre-injury average weekly wage of $825.91 and thus reversed that portion of the WCJ’s Decision. On appeal, the Employer argued that the is not required to demonstrate job availability given that Claimant’s non-work-related injuries are totally disabling.

Unfortunately, the Commonwealth Court agreed with Employer’s argument. They first cited Section 413 of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act and the Kachinski case in which our Supreme Court interpreted that section to mean that the employer who seeks to modify a claimant’s benefits must first produce evidence of a change in condition, then the employer must produce evidence of a referral to a then open job (or jobs) which fits in the occupational category for which the claimant has been given medical clearance, then the burden shifts to claimant to demonstrate that he has in good faith followed through on the job referral(s) and if the referral fails to result in a job then claimant’s benefits should continue.

The Commonwealth Court looked to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court case, Schneider, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Bey), 560 Pa. 608, 747 A.2d 845 (2000), where the Court held that the employer was not required to show job availability where the claimant was totally disabled by non-work-related conditions. While the injuries in Schneider were more severe, the Employer was successful in showing that the facts were similar and that Schneider applies.

This holding contradicts the spirit of Kachinski. It is not a favorable ruling for injured workers in Pennsylvania. Employers should have to show job availability but Schneider and the instant case are making it easier for employers to modify or suspend claimants’ benefits by lowering the burden of proof required to suspend an injured worker’s benefits in similar circumstances.

Contact Pennsylvania Work Comp Attorney Michael W. Cardamone for a Free Consult 7 Days A Week. 215-206-9068; MyPhillyWorkersComp@Gmail.com; 100% for Injured Workers

The Cardamone Law Firm

The Firm For Injured Workers In Pennsylvania

Awards & Recognitions

Philadelphia workers comp lawyer
Philadelphia workmans comp lawyer
Bucks County workers comp lawyer
best workmans comp lawyer philadelphia
Philadelphia Workmans Comp Lawyer
Top 10 Attorneys Award Pennsylvania workers' comp lawyer
Philadelphia workmans comp lawyer
Philadelphia workers compensation lawyer
best bucks county workmans comp lawyer
Avvo Rating 10.0 Philadelphia workers' comp lawyer
Workmans comp lawyer
best workmans comp attorney
best Philly workmans comp lawyer
Bucks county workmans comp lawyer
best Philadelphia workmans comp lawyer

Cardamone Law Has Negotiated Some of the Largest Workers’ Comp Settlements in Pennsylvania

$6 Million
We Assisted Another Firm in Reaching Settlement
$2.2 Million
Spinal Injury
$897,000
Lower Back Injury
$650,000
Lower Back Injury
$550,000
Neck Injury
$425,000
Leg Injury
$375,000
Knee Injury
$325,000
Ankle Injury
& Hundreds More Cases
$6 Million
We Assisted Another Firm in Reaching Settlement
$2.2 Million
Spinal Injury
$897,000
Lower Back Injury
$650,000
Lower Back Injury
$550,000
Neck Injury
$425,000
Leg Injury
$375,000
Knee Injury
$325,000
Ankle Injury
& Hundreds More Cases

Client Testimonials

"Best Law Firm around!"

"Cardomone law is absolutely fantastic! They are very responsive and helpful and they will fight to get you what you deserve. Shirley is also very helpful whenever you have any questions! Best Law Firm around!"

- C. Edwards
Google Reviews
"Michael and Shirley are very dedicated...and getting the maximum amount favorable to my case"

"Cardamone Law Firm were very helpful to me since day one. Michael and Shirley are very dedicated to my case giving me updates, answering my questions, being honest with my case, and getting the maximum amount favorable to my case. Thank you so much for your service and dedication and helping me to achieve not only your case but to guide and refer me in other needs too! You guys are the best law firm friendly and dedicated. I will recommend to anyone."

- A. Ortiz
Google Reviews
"Michael won my workers comp case after my employer insurance denied my claim."

"Exceptional firm. Highly recommend this law firm. Michael won my Workers Comp case after my employer insurance denied my claim. Him and his staff were always at my reach for legal and emotional support. Am so happy I hire them. Thanks Michael and Ms. Shirley."

- Carlos P.
Google Reviews
"[They] did an excellent job in getting me financially compensated in a fairly short amount of time."

"I recently had a work related injury and was receiving Workers' Compensation (medical benefits only). Soon after I was fired, so I contacted Paul Silver at Cardamone Law Firm who did an excellent job in getting me financially compensated in a fairly short amount of time. Paul and his assistant Shirley always responded to any questions I had about the case in a very short amount of time. Thank you for helping me with this difficult case."

- Robin C.
Google Reviews
"Highly recommend."

"Cardamone Law was great with helping my husband with his Workers Comp issues. Mike and Shirley were the best with letting us know what was going on every step of the way. Highly recommend."

- Danielle P.
Google Reviews
"Mike Cardamone is amazing"

"Mike Cardamone is amazing. He is "hands down" one of the best lawyers I've ever had the privilege of knowing. He is very kind, understanding, knowledgeable in his field, always very thorough and helpful. He was extremely professional and someone who truly cares about his clients. I felt completely at ease with him. He was a pleasure to work with, explained everything in detail, as well as answered all my questions with knowledge and care. If you want someone you can trust, who communicates every step of the way, will fight for you and make sure you win your case, he is it! I will refer all my family and friends to him. Thank you so much Mike, for everything. I appreciate all your hard work and dedication in helping me."

- Allie M.
Google Reviews
Without a doubt YOU are the best!!!

"Without a doubt YOU are the best!!! Every person who is in the horrible position of being injured at work should have someone as kind, compassionate and knowledgeable as you on their side. You never once made me feel like I was one of a hundred other clients. I always knew you had my back! You answered calls and emails at all hours. You fought every fight for me so I only had to worry about getting well. Behind your nice, calm face there’s a pit bull ready to take on any employer or judge. I can never thank you enough."

- L. Edall
Google Reviews
"Best Workers' Comp Lawyer!"

"Michael is simply the best! He was there for me from day 1 till the end, and we won the case!! He is always available to help. I had a gazillion questions and he would answer them one by one. He's a great lawyer and I feel lucky to have found him online from reading other outstanding reviews about him. Believe me, they're true!"

- Faith B.
Google Reviews
"Great Attorney"

"Great attorney, handled case quickly and efficiently. I would recommend him and would use him again. He was always available to answer any questions we had. Thank you, Mr. Cardamone."

- H. Anderson
Google Reviews