Close
No Recovery No Fee Guaranteed
The Official Partner of the American WorkerSM

Alfred Napierski v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Scobell Company, Inc.)- What Must Claimant Show For A Reinstatement Of Benefits After A Bad Faith Refusal Of An Available Job?

In January 2013, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, in Napierski v. WCAB (Scobell Company, Inc.), held that once a claimant has refused an available job in bad faith, his employer’s obligation to show job availability ceases. The claimant “must live with the consequences of [his] decision”, meaning he cannot remedy the situation by “subsequent action” such as attempting to accept the job that was previously offered and declined. Instead, the claimant must show a worsening of his medical condition to be awarded a reinstatement to total disability.

Some factual context: Claimant was a plumber who injured his left leg on July 28, 1995 when a ditch collapsed. Employer accepted his claim and began paying him temporary total disability benefits. Subsequently, Employer referred Claimant to Expediter- a company that aids employees to return to work. They found Claimant a full-time, sedentary (seated) job with a company called IDI, Inc. working 40 hours per week in telephone customer service.  The job was funded by the Employer and paid less than Claimant’s pre-injury average weekly wage. Claimant’s own doctor approved the job.

Claimant began working this job in October 2004 but in March 2005, IDI moved him to a second office and then to a third office in August 2005.  The moves were allegedly necessitated by problems in the offices, including heating issues and rodents. When Claimant observed mouse feces in paperwork that had been imported from the second office, he quite immediately, claiming the Employer was “playing games” with him. Employer filed a Petition to Modify and the Workers’ Compensation Judge found the IDI job fell within his physical capacities but became “unavailable” to Claimant in January 2005 when the heat malfunctioned. But, it became “available” once again by August 19, 2005 at the third office location. Thus, the WCJ modified his benefits based on what he could have earned at IDI from August 19, 2005 into the future.

On June 30, 2010, Claimant asked Employer to fund the job for him again so that he could return to work. Employer didn’t respond. He then filed the Reinstatement Petition asking for total disability benefits because the funded employment was no longer available to him.

In reaching its conclusion, noted above, the Commonwealth Court reviewed the burdens of proof in reinstatement contexts. First, it noted that typically a partially disabled claimant can reinstate to total disability by showing that his earning power is once again adversely affected by his work injury. (Piper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments, 526, Pa. 25, 33, 584 A.2d 301, 304 (1990)). Yet it noted that a claimant’s burden of proof is different where his benefits have been modified because of his bad faith conduct. (Ward v. Workers’ Compensastion Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia), 966 A.2d 1159, 1162 (Pa Cmwlth. 2009)). The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in Pitt Ohio Express v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Wolff), 590 Pa. 99, 912 A.2d 206 (2006), held that a claimant’s bad faith refusal of employment relieves the employer of the need to show that a job continues to be available. The Court reasoned that if a claimant rejects a job in bad faith and then puts the burden on the employer, it would reward bad faith conduct and circumvent the purpose of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act.

In a footnote, the Commonwealth Court pointed out something quite significant. That is, before the 1996 amendments to the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act, an employer could obtain a modification if it could show that suitable employment was made available to the claimant. Once the employer referred claimant to an available job, the burden shifted to the claimant to prove that he followed through on the job referral in good faith. (this modification landscape was pursuant to a case called “Kachinski“) After 1996, employers have most frequenly used Labor Market Surveys to establish an earning power- this scheme does NOT require a referral to an actual job, but instead, it is a survey of allegedly available jobs that exist in the local economy where a claimant lives (or was injured) that are allegedly within the claimant’s physical and vocational abilities.

In today’s Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation world, we do not see many Kachinski type Petitions to Modify. But they still exist, as this case demonstrates, and it is important, as a practitioner- and as a claimant- to understand the burdens of proof in various situations.

For more information or a free analysis of your PA Work Comp claim, call or email Experienced PA Work Injury Lawyer Michael W. Cardamone 7 days a week TOLL FREE at (877) 560-7090 or Michael@cardamonelaw.com

Pennsylvania Workers’ Comp Attorney

 

 

Awards & Recognitions

Philadelphia workers comp lawyer
Philadelphia workmans comp lawyer
Bucks County workers comp lawyer
best workmans comp lawyer philadelphia
Philadelphia Workmans Comp Lawyer
Top 10 Attorneys Award Pennsylvania workers' comp lawyer
Philadelphia workmans comp lawyer
Philadelphia workers compensation lawyer
best bucks county workmans comp lawyer
Avvo Rating 10.0 Philadelphia workers' comp lawyer
Workmans comp lawyer
best workmans comp attorney
best Philly workmans comp lawyer
Bucks county workmans comp lawyer
best Philadelphia workmans comp lawyer

Cardamone Law Has Negotiated Some of the Largest Workers’ Comp Settlements in Pennsylvania

$6 Million
We Assisted Another Firm in Reaching Settlement
$2.2 Million
Spinal Injury
$897,000
Lower Back Injury
$650,000
Lower Back Injury
$550,000
Neck Injury
$425,000
Leg Injury
$375,000
Knee Injury
$325,000
Ankle Injury
& Hundreds More Cases
$6 Million
We Assisted Another Firm in Reaching Settlement
$2.2 Million
Spinal Injury
$897,000
Lower Back Injury
$650,000
Lower Back Injury
$550,000
Neck Injury
$425,000
Leg Injury
$375,000
Knee Injury
$325,000
Ankle Injury
& Hundreds More Cases

Client Testimonials

"Best Law Firm around!"

"Cardomone law is absolutely fantastic! They are very responsive and helpful and they will fight to get you what you deserve. Shirley is also very helpful whenever you have any questions! Best Law Firm around!"

- C. Edwards
Google Reviews
"Michael and Shirley are very dedicated...and getting the maximum amount favorable to my case"

"Cardamone Law Firm were very helpful to me since day one. Michael and Shirley are very dedicated to my case giving me updates, answering my questions, being honest with my case, and getting the maximum amount favorable to my case. Thank you so much for your service and dedication and helping me to achieve not only your case but to guide and refer me in other needs too! You guys are the best law firm friendly and dedicated. I will recommend to anyone."

- A. Ortiz
Google Reviews
"Michael won my workers comp case after my employer insurance denied my claim."

"Exceptional firm. Highly recommend this law firm. Michael won my Workers Comp case after my employer insurance denied my claim. Him and his staff were always at my reach for legal and emotional support. Am so happy I hire them. Thanks Michael and Ms. Shirley."

- Carlos P.
Google Reviews
"[They] did an excellent job in getting me financially compensated in a fairly short amount of time."

"I recently had a work related injury and was receiving Workers' Compensation (medical benefits only). Soon after I was fired, so I contacted Paul Silver at Cardamone Law Firm who did an excellent job in getting me financially compensated in a fairly short amount of time. Paul and his assistant Shirley always responded to any questions I had about the case in a very short amount of time. Thank you for helping me with this difficult case."

- Robin C.
Google Reviews
"Highly recommend."

"Cardamone Law was great with helping my husband with his Workers Comp issues. Mike and Shirley were the best with letting us know what was going on every step of the way. Highly recommend."

- Danielle P.
Google Reviews
"Mike Cardamone is amazing"

"Mike Cardamone is amazing. He is "hands down" one of the best lawyers I've ever had the privilege of knowing. He is very kind, understanding, knowledgeable in his field, always very thorough and helpful. He was extremely professional and someone who truly cares about his clients. I felt completely at ease with him. He was a pleasure to work with, explained everything in detail, as well as answered all my questions with knowledge and care. If you want someone you can trust, who communicates every step of the way, will fight for you and make sure you win your case, he is it! I will refer all my family and friends to him. Thank you so much Mike, for everything. I appreciate all your hard work and dedication in helping me."

- Allie M.
Google Reviews
Without a doubt YOU are the best!!!

"Without a doubt YOU are the best!!! Every person who is in the horrible position of being injured at work should have someone as kind, compassionate and knowledgeable as you on their side. You never once made me feel like I was one of a hundred other clients. I always knew you had my back! You answered calls and emails at all hours. You fought every fight for me so I only had to worry about getting well. Behind your nice, calm face there’s a pit bull ready to take on any employer or judge. I can never thank you enough."

- L. Edall
Google Reviews
"Best Workers' Comp Lawyer!"

"Michael is simply the best! He was there for me from day 1 till the end, and we won the case!! He is always available to help. I had a gazillion questions and he would answer them one by one. He's a great lawyer and I feel lucky to have found him online from reading other outstanding reviews about him. Believe me, they're true!"

- Faith B.
Google Reviews
"Great Attorney"

"Great attorney, handled case quickly and efficiently. I would recommend him and would use him again. He was always available to answer any questions we had. Thank you, Mr. Cardamone."

- H. Anderson
Google Reviews